COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENERATION ALPHA AND GENERATION Z: EDUCATIONAL PREFERENCES, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES

Authors

  • Faryal Sarfraz Author
  • Syeda Sadia Muslim Author
  • Naeem Hussain Author
  • Masooma Ansari Author

Keywords:

Generation Z, Generation Alpha, digital natives, educational technology, blended learning, social-emotional learning, AI-assisted instruction, generational learning differences

Abstract

This comparative study examines educational preferences and technological integration patterns of Generation Z (born mid-1990s to early 2010s) and Generation Alpha (born after 2010) through quantitative analysis of 27 participants from both cohorts. Generation Z demonstrates strong preferences for collaborative, social media-integrated learning environments, while Generation Alpha exhibits intuitive comfort with AI-powered learning systems and voice-activated educational tools. Statistical analysis confirms that blended learning strategies combining AI-assisted instruction with collaborative activities significantly outperform traditional methods for both generations. Digital literacy positively correlates with academic performance, while excessive screen time negatively impacts achievement across both cohorts. Critical findings reveal pronounced social-emotional learning challenges, particularly for Generation Alpha due to earlier intensive digital exposure. The research demonstrates that effective education for digitally native generations requires fundamental pedagogical transformation toward generation-specific methodologies that balance technological integration with essential human skill development, emphasizing the need for differentiated instructional strategies that leverage each generation's technological strengths while addressing their specific developmental needs.

Downloads

Published

19-09-2025

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENERATION ALPHA AND GENERATION Z: EDUCATIONAL PREFERENCES, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES. (2025). International Journal of Social Sciences Bulletin, 3(9), 549-562. https://ijssbulletin.com/index.php/IJSSB/article/view/1245