COMPARING THE ROLE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF LAW IN TACKLING FINANCIAL CORRUPTION IN PAKISTAN AND U.K

Abstract

This research offers a comparative analysis of anti-corruption laws in the United Kingdom and Pakistan, critically examining the legal frameworks, institutional mechanisms, and the effectiveness of their implementation. While Pakistan has enacted several strong legislations to combat financial corruption, this study finds that enforcement remains severely lacking, particularly in cases involving politically powerful and influential individuals, including the military. In contrast, the UK’s model emphasizes transparency, independent oversight bodies, and accountability, resulting in a more functional and credible anti-corruption system. Drawing from legislative reviews, case law, and real-world examples, this paper argues that the core issue in Pakistan is not the absence of law but the failure to implement it. The article concludes with policy recommendations for Pakistan, including the need for stronger enforcement agencies, judicial independence, and increased public transparency. These reforms are essential not only to reduce corruption but also to restore public trust in state institutions.